Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of Ticket #93
- Timestamp:
- 2024-04-27T08:32:14Z (3 weeks ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #93 – Description
v7 v8 1 1 1. An eligible INCI name has been added to the mix of permissable names if CAS and IUPAC names are not known. No change to the software is required beyond slightly updating the help-text. 2 2 3 2. If none of the above is known to the introducer then we need a name of a person in the Chemical Identity Holder(CIH) field who has provided or is expected to provide identifying information to the Executive Director.3 2. If none of the above is known to the introducer then we need a name of a person in the ''Chemical information holder'' (CIH) field who has provided or is expected to provide identifying information to the Executive Director. 4 4 5 5 3. We also need a note indicating the basis of the expectation that the person named will give the identifying information to the Executive Director if requested. … … 15 15 Under all circumstances it will be an error if all three of CAS, IUPAC and INCI names are blank and the ''Chemical information holder'' field is also blank. 16 16 17 Correction here: There is no point raising an error if the only issue is the user happens to be saving data entered before (yet) entering those names. In fact the error will only occur if the user selects "Introducer does not know the CAS number or CAS name or IUPAC or INCI name for the introduced chemical" in the ''Information availability'' field while simultaneously leaving the ''Chemical information holder'' field blank.17 Correction here: There is no point raising an error if the only issue is the user happens to be saving data entered before (yet) entering those names. In fact the error will will be raised if the user selects "Introducer does not know ..." in the ''Information availability'' field while simultaneously leaving the ''Chemical information holder'' field blank. 18 18 19 19
